The standard is aimed for Educational Institutions. The
standard has number of peculiarities as listed below:
1.
Instead of use of word customer- it is divided
as Sponsor, Learner.
2.
Tutor is Facilitator, or Associate based on the
role.
3.
The PDCA approach is drafted suiting to the
processes- Needs analysis/ Design/ execution/ Evaluation and monitoring.
4.
Design aspect is made clear with terms related
to design- curriculum, evaluation, and schedule.
5.
Scope of
organization is clarified on facilities, guideline notes, additional notes
6.
Evaluation process, concept is clarified
further.
7.
Preventive actions are prior to Corrective
actions again a peculiar requirement.
8.
The requirement of documentation, Procedures,
records are explicitly specified.
9.
Monitoring from competent person, nature of
feedback expected ( from sponsor, learner) are different.
10.
The standard gives the purpose or expectations
of certain clause requirements like document control.
11.
The requirement of quality manual is not specified,
giving flexibility to the organization.
12.
The management requirements are business
oriented and more in line with current business practices- Finance, risk
management, business planning, strategy etc.
Benefits envisaged are:
1.
Very focussed findings can emerge which are
relevant to educational organization.
2.
The standard has elaborate requirements on
learning needs, design of training. This will bring in some basic findings
related to education.
3.
The clarity in what type of feedback expected
from each interested party is different.
Implementation:
1.
The organization must have PDCA approach. This
means
P – Need analysis, Competence,
Infrastructure, and Environment
D- Design, Delivery of training
C-Monitoring, evaluation, feedback, Audits
A-PACA, Reviews, Business planning
2.
The documented system must address these
requirements.
3.
The manual/ overall process chart/ matrix must
address all the clauses.
4.
The mandatory procedures are documented in each
clause accordingly- namely
3.3, 3.5.1c, 3.5.3.c, 4.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6.e,
4.7, 4.9.
The documents required for each clause
requirement- 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 4.1, 4.2, 4.5, 4.6, Annexures.
5.
Hence for example documented need analysis, curriculum
& exam pattern design shall be documented for each training.
Like this all such areas need to be
established in the system.
6.
The expectation on type of feedback from sponsor
and that from learner is different. The monitoring from competent authority is
again different. This can be ideally compared to a 360deg feedback method used
by world class organizations.
Internal audit, PACA, Reviews:
During implementation the system needs to be
assessed. Considering the nature of sector, the amendment is evident asking to
audit each area at least once in 3 years.
The auditor suitably qualified for any standard,
and having knowledge of this standard can be used.
The PA is considered prior, probably
because this is not a conventional manufacturing and rejections, defect are not
clearly defined. For example a delayed completion / stretched topic, getting
different need later during training can be more of PA than call for CA.
The purpose, output of review is clearly
defined giving little elaborate agenda.
Completely new focus or a business focus is an interesting
feature. A clear explanation about contents of business plan. This gives a great benefit and a well-directed
move towards sustained success.
For Auditors:
The entire audit is on core areas; hence any finding will be
definitely adding value. The deviations will clearly show the risks / threats
and will direct organization to think about future, and add to its image.
No comments:
Post a Comment